| Title | Regards d’Ibn Rushd sur al-Juwaynî. Questions de méthodes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 199–216 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Mokdad Arfa Mensia |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This essay is concerned with the complex relationships between falsafa and kalām. As regards the history of the latter, it has been generally agreed that al-Juwaynī played a decisive role at a moment when Avicennism became intrusive. It is mainly in his al-ʿAqīda al-niẓāmiyya that al-Juwaynī initiated a doctrinal and methodic evolution of Ashʿarism. One necessarily invokes here Ibn Rushd, who, by exposing the dogmas in their literal manifestation in his al-Kashf ʿan manāhij al-adilla fī ʿaqāʾid al-milla, actually sought to operate a systematic refutation of the Ashʿarites' theses. It should be noted, however, that, despite his critical distance, Ibn Rushd nonetheless remained attentive to al-Juwaynī's evolutionary study. In this contribution, some aspects of the major issues in kalām will be examined: the existence of God and the argument of takhṣīṣ (particularization), His unicity (waḥdāniyya) and the argument of mumānaʿa (mutual hindering), as well as human agency with the acknowledgement of man's capacity (qudra) and its role. Albeit limited in scope, the essay attempts to make a more profound evaluation of al-Juwaynī's role at a crucial moment of the history of kalām in its specific development during which the Great Masters have not always been faithful to the classical tenets of their school, but also in its relations with falsafa and its influence on al-Juwaynī, and then and mainly on his disciple al-Ghazālī's theological thought. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1789","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1789,"authors_free":[{"id":2063,"entry_id":1789,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1036,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mokdad Arfa Mensia","free_first_name":"Mokdad Arfa","free_last_name":"Mensia","norm_person":{"id":1036,"first_name":"Mokdad Arfa","last_name":"Mensia","full_name":"Mokdad Arfa Mensia","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/187255466","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/3380832","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mokdad Arfa Mensia"}}],"entry_title":"Regards d\u2019Ibn Rushd sur al-Juwayn\u00ee. Questions de m\u00e9thodes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Regards d\u2019Ibn Rushd sur al-Juwayn\u00ee. Questions de m\u00e9thodes"},"abstract":"This essay is concerned with the complex relationships between falsafa and kal\u0101m. As regards the history of the latter, it has been generally agreed that al-Juwayn\u012b played a decisive role at a moment when Avicennism became intrusive. It is mainly in his al-\u02bfAq\u012bda al-ni\u1e93\u0101miyya that al-Juwayn\u012b initiated a doctrinal and methodic evolution of Ash\u02bfarism. One necessarily invokes here Ibn Rushd, who, by exposing the dogmas in their literal manifestation in his al-Kashf \u02bfan man\u0101hij al-adilla f\u012b \u02bfaq\u0101\u02beid al-milla, actually sought to operate a systematic refutation of the Ash\u02bfarites' theses. It should be noted, however, that, despite his critical distance, Ibn Rushd nonetheless remained attentive to al-Juwayn\u012b's evolutionary study. In this contribution, some aspects of the major issues in kal\u0101m will be examined: the existence of God and the argument of takh\u1e63\u012b\u1e63 (particularization), His unicity (wa\u1e25d\u0101niyya) and the argument of mum\u0101na\u02bfa (mutual hindering), as well as human agency with the acknowledgement of man's capacity (qudra) and its role. Albeit limited in scope, the essay attempts to make a more profound evaluation of al-Juwayn\u012b's role at a crucial moment of the history of kal\u0101m in its specific development during which the Great Masters have not always been faithful to the classical tenets of their school, but also in its relations with falsafa and its influence on al-Juwayn\u012b, and then and mainly on his disciple al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's theological thought.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0957423912000021","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1036,"full_name":"Mokdad Arfa Mensia","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1789,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"22","issue":"2","pages":"199\u2013216"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Regards d’Ibn Rushd sur al-Juwaynî. Questions de méthodes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 199–216 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Mokdad Arfa Mensia |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This essay is concerned with the complex relationships between falsafa and kalām. As regards the history of the latter, it has been generally agreed that al-Juwaynī played a decisive role at a moment when Avicennism became intrusive. It is mainly in his al-ʿAqīda al-niẓāmiyya that al-Juwaynī initiated a doctrinal and methodic evolution of Ashʿarism. One necessarily invokes here Ibn Rushd, who, by exposing the dogmas in their literal manifestation in his al-Kashf ʿan manāhij al-adilla fī ʿaqāʾid al-milla, actually sought to operate a systematic refutation of the Ashʿarites' theses. It should be noted, however, that, despite his critical distance, Ibn Rushd nonetheless remained attentive to al-Juwaynī's evolutionary study. In this contribution, some aspects of the major issues in kalām will be examined: the existence of God and the argument of takhṣīṣ (particularization), His unicity (waḥdāniyya) and the argument of mumānaʿa (mutual hindering), as well as human agency with the acknowledgement of man's capacity (qudra) and its role. Albeit limited in scope, the essay attempts to make a more profound evaluation of al-Juwaynī's role at a crucial moment of the history of kalām in its specific development during which the Great Masters have not always been faithful to the classical tenets of their school, but also in its relations with falsafa and its influence on al-Juwaynī, and then and mainly on his disciple al-Ghazālī's theological thought. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1789","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1789,"authors_free":[{"id":2063,"entry_id":1789,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1036,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mokdad Arfa Mensia","free_first_name":"Mokdad Arfa","free_last_name":"Mensia","norm_person":{"id":1036,"first_name":"Mokdad Arfa","last_name":"Mensia","full_name":"Mokdad Arfa Mensia","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/187255466","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/3380832","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mokdad Arfa Mensia"}}],"entry_title":"Regards d\u2019Ibn Rushd sur al-Juwayn\u00ee. Questions de m\u00e9thodes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Regards d\u2019Ibn Rushd sur al-Juwayn\u00ee. Questions de m\u00e9thodes"},"abstract":"This essay is concerned with the complex relationships between falsafa and kal\u0101m. As regards the history of the latter, it has been generally agreed that al-Juwayn\u012b played a decisive role at a moment when Avicennism became intrusive. It is mainly in his al-\u02bfAq\u012bda al-ni\u1e93\u0101miyya that al-Juwayn\u012b initiated a doctrinal and methodic evolution of Ash\u02bfarism. One necessarily invokes here Ibn Rushd, who, by exposing the dogmas in their literal manifestation in his al-Kashf \u02bfan man\u0101hij al-adilla f\u012b \u02bfaq\u0101\u02beid al-milla, actually sought to operate a systematic refutation of the Ash\u02bfarites' theses. It should be noted, however, that, despite his critical distance, Ibn Rushd nonetheless remained attentive to al-Juwayn\u012b's evolutionary study. In this contribution, some aspects of the major issues in kal\u0101m will be examined: the existence of God and the argument of takh\u1e63\u012b\u1e63 (particularization), His unicity (wa\u1e25d\u0101niyya) and the argument of mum\u0101na\u02bfa (mutual hindering), as well as human agency with the acknowledgement of man's capacity (qudra) and its role. Albeit limited in scope, the essay attempts to make a more profound evaluation of al-Juwayn\u012b's role at a crucial moment of the history of kal\u0101m in its specific development during which the Great Masters have not always been faithful to the classical tenets of their school, but also in its relations with falsafa and its influence on al-Juwayn\u012b, and then and mainly on his disciple al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's theological thought.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0957423912000021","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1036,"full_name":"Mokdad Arfa Mensia","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1789,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"22","issue":"2","pages":"199\u2013216"}},"sort":["Regards d\u2019Ibn Rushd sur al-Juwayn\u00ee. Questions de m\u00e9thodes"]}